Inappropriate Treatment of Sore Throat
The Story:
A woman in her fifties
called complaining of sore throat, fever (101), with no other respiratory
symptoms. Due to distance, I
advised her to go to a local clinic to get tested for Strep throat. At the clinic, the doctor took one look
at her throat and, without testing for Strep, diagnosed Streptococcal
pharyngitis and gave her an expensive antibiotic (a cephalosporin) to be taken
for one week. The woman called
back to say that she was treated without being tested and so I asked her to
come in after hours. Her throat
was red without visible pus and her office Strep test was negative. A throat culture was done and
antibiotics were withheld. By the
time her throat culture was reported negative, her sore throat and fever had
resolved without treatment.
The Messages:
a) A Strep throat is not a
clinical diagnosis. It a serious
infection that should be accurately diagnosed because it can cause kidney or
heart damage and may also cause inter-family epidemics that can have serious
long-term consequences. It should
be treated for ten days, not seven, and all close family contacts should be
tested and also treated if found to be carriers. Diagnosing it clinically and ignoring family contacts is
contrary to scientific evidence and so is treating the patient for seven,
instead of ten days with a non-penicillin antibiotic, and without confirmation of the streptococcal infection by proper lab tests.
b) Oklahoma is ranked highest
in inappropriate antibiotic prescribing and also in bacterial resistance, a direct result of antibiotic overuse.